Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Tolbert

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 20, 1995No. 03712; 00664PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

These appeals require us to address the complex issue of collateral estoppel in criminal retrials. Our review of the record leads us to affirm the judgment of sentence in appellant Smith’s case and affirm the collateral order in appellant Tolbert’s case. A thorough summary of the history of the cases, both factual and procedural, must precede our analysis.

Appellants Anthony Tolbert and John Smith were accused, along with another man named Anthony Russo, of beating to death the victim, Hector Maldonado. The Commonwealth’s theory of the case began with Maldonado’s failure to deliver…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. United States v. Patrice Mespoulede, A/K/A "Patrice Fabre"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. MarshallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. HudeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bond v. BeardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  2. Commonwealth v. SullivanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Commonwealth v. RolanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Commonwealth v. KimbroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. MarksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API