Bromley v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of tbe superior court of Milwaukee county: Ghso. E. SutheelaND, Judge. Tbe facts are stated in the opinion. To tbe proposition that tbe agent, who bad mingled in a bank trust funds with bis own, was presumed to have drawn out his own money in preference to tbe trust money, they cited In re Nallett’s Estate (Knatschbidl v. Hallett), 13 Cb. Div. 696; McLeod v. Evans, 66 Wis. 401; Nonotuck 8. Go. v. Flanders, 8T Wis. 241;. Burnham v. Ba/rth, 89 Wis. 368.
1Opinion of the CourtCassoday, C. J.
It appears from tbe record that July 20, 1894, William W. Bromley, tbe then husband of tbe plaintiff, obtained a policy of insurance on bis life, payable to the plaintiff, issued by tbe Provident Savings Life Assurance Society of New York, for $5,000; that December 2, 1896, William W. Bromley obtained another policy of insurance on bis life, payable to tbe plaintiff, issued by tbe Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, for $2,000; that March 11, 1897, William W. Bromley died; that thereupon tbe plaintiff, as tbe beneficiary named in’ each of such policies, brought a suit on each of such…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Holmes v. . GilmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Nonotuck Silk Co. v. FlandersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
- Ferchen v. ArndtOregon Supreme Court · 1894
- Bishop v. MahoneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- In re Plankinton BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Truelsch v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Emigh v. EarlingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- Vorlander v. KeyesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Boyle v. Northwestern National BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Lee v. PreissWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.