Legal Opinion

Neumann v. Rogstad

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1988No. 87-529PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy

Plaintiff appeals the order of the District Court of the Eighth Judicial District, Cascade County, granting summary judgment in favor of defendant. We affirm.

The issues before the Court are:

1. Did the District Court correctly determine that the plaintiff failed to properly file a claim against decedent’s estate?

2. Did the District Court correctly determine that summary judgment was proper?

3. Did the District Court err when it failed to grant costs and attorney fees pursuant to Section 72-12-206, MCA?

Albert Neumann (Albert) and Isabel Neumann (Isabel) were married in 1932. During the early…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. TindallMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Strong Bros. Enterprises, Inc. v. Estate of StrongColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Wunderlich v. HoltMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Peterson v. MarstonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gabriel v. WoodMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Joseph Eve & Co. v. AllenMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Montanye v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. In Re the Estate of BraatenMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. In Re the Estate of EricksonMontana Supreme Court · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API