In Re the Estate of Erickson

¶1 This appeal comes from the District Court’s denial of a motion for relief from a judgment or order under M. R. Civ. P. 60(b).

¶2 We restate the issues on appeal as follows:

Issue One: Did the District Court err in determining M. R. Civ. P. 60(b) did not apply?

Issue Two: Did the District Court err in denying Gail’s motion to modify a formal testacy order under § 72-3-317(4), MCA?

Issue Three: Did the District Court err in denying Gail’s request for imposition of a constructive trust ?

Issue Four: Is the Personal Representative entitled to attorney fees and costs pursuant to § 72-12-206, MCA?

FACT…