Legal Opinion
Marine Oil Trading Ltd. v. Motor Tanker Paros
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided May 14, 2003No. Civ.A. 2:02CV800PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant Erin Shipping’s motion to dismiss, filed on behalf of the M/T PAROS, and the plaintiffs motion for default judgment. After examination of the briefs and record, this court determines oral argument is unnecessary because the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. The defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the plaintiffs motion for default judgment is DENIED.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
This action arises…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Amstar Corp. v. S/S Alexandros T.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Sembawang Shipyard, Ltd., Cross-Appellant v. Charger, Inc., and M/v Charger, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Trinidad Foundry & Fabricating, Ltd. v. M/V K.A.S. CamillaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- Liverpool & London Steamship Protection & Indemnity Ass'n v. QUEEN OF LEMAN MVCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bominflot, Inc. v. The M/V HENRICH SCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Trans-Tec Asia v. M/V HARMONY CONTAINERDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
- World Fuel Services Trading, DMCC v. M/V Hebei ShijiazhuangDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
- Vestoil, Ltd. v. M/V M PioneerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Cal Dive Offshore Contractors, Inc. v. M/V SampsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.