Legal Opinion

Sembawang Shipyard, Ltd., Cross-Appellant v. Charger, Inc., and M/v Charger, Cross-Appellees

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 16, 1992No. 91-3195PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUHÉ, Circuit Judge:

Sitting in admiralty, we face a number of questions involving maritime jurisdiction, both in personam and in rem, as well as issues of international law and arbitration. We hold that the parties contracted for Singapore law to govern all disputes arising from this transaction. We further hold that the Plaintiff improperly arrested the Vessel under Supplemental Rule C. The Plaintiff could have attached the Vessel under Supplemental Rule B, however, and we will allow it to reach the ship’s bond in spite of Plaintiffs technical mistake; the Defendant can show no prejudice in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Vandewater v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
  4. Deutsche Bank Filiale Nurnberg v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. EJ DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. VanceSupreme Court of the United States · 1857

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Ishwar Jain v. Henri Courier De MereCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  2. Trinidad Foundry & Fabricating, Ltd. v. M/V K.A.S. CamillaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  3. Liverpool & London Steamship Protection & Indemnity Ass'n v. QUEEN OF LEMAN MVCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  4. Marine Oil Trading Ltd. v. Motor Tanker ParosDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
  5. Redcliffe Americas Ltd. v. M/V TYSON LYKESDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1992

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API