Legal Opinion

Amstar Corp. v. S/S Alexandros T.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided November 10, 1981No. 79-1493PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUTZNER, Circuit Judge:

Rule C for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims, as implemented by rule E, provides, among other things, for the arrest of a vessel in an in rem action to enforce a maritime lien. Upon the filing of a complaint and the clerk’s issuance of a warrant, the marshal is authorized to take custody of the vessel.1 The primary question raised in *906this appeal is whether the district court erred by holding that rule C is constitutional. The second issue is whether the district court properly assessed damages for cargo loss. Finding no error of law or fact, we affirm the judgment…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Vitol, S.A. v. Primerose Shipping Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  2. R.M.S. Titanic, Inc. v. HaverCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  3. The Merchants National Bank of Mobile v. The Dredge General G. L. Gillespie, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. Polar Shipping Ltd. v. Oriental Shipping Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. Wajilam Exports (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. v. ATL Shipping Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API