Amstar Corp. v. S/S Alexandros T.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BUTZNER, Circuit Judge:
Rule C for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims, as implemented by rule E, provides, among other things, for the arrest of a vessel in an in rem action to enforce a maritime lien. Upon the filing of a complaint and the clerk’s issuance of a warrant, the marshal is authorized to take custody of the vessel.1 The primary question raised in *906this appeal is whether the district court erred by holding that rule C is constitutional. The second issue is whether the district court properly assessed damages for cargo loss. Finding no error of law or fact, we affirm the judgment…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Vitol, S.A. v. Primerose Shipping Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- R.M.S. Titanic, Inc. v. HaverCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- The Merchants National Bank of Mobile v. The Dredge General G. L. Gillespie, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Polar Shipping Ltd. v. Oriental Shipping Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Wajilam Exports (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. v. ATL Shipping Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.