Legal Opinion

Greco v. Suffolk Division of the Probate & Family Court Department

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 1, 1994PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLiacos, C.J.

This action arose from the failure of the Suffolk Division of the Probate and Family Court Department (court) to provide Frank A. Greco (plaintiff) with a tape recording of an ex parte hearing in which his wife, the plaintiff in a divorce proceeding, sought a temporary restraining order against him. See G. L. c. 208, §§ 34B, 34C (1992 ed.). Notwithstanding the requirement of Rule 201 of the Supplemental Rules of the Probate Court (1994) that such a proceeding *154be recorded electronically and made available to a party on request, the tape has not been provided to the plaintiff.1 In his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rogan v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  2. Delisle v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  3. Callahan v. Boston Municipal Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  4. Pandey v. Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Greco v. Plymouth Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  2. Maza v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  3. Milton v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  4. Davis v. TabachnickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  5. Hicks v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API