Legal Opinion

DiNozzi v. Lovejoy

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 27, 1985PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff suffered from back pain and her expert, Dr. Southmayd, an orthopedic surgeon, gave to the panel a written opinion which said in substance that the defendant, Dr. Lovejoy (an orthopedist), had failed to *974diagnose a raptured disc and had failed to undertake prompt surgical intervention. Had intervention been prompt, Dr. Southmayd added (he performed such surgery), the patient would have experienced a significantly better result. Dr. Southmayd gave his opinion upon “reasonable medical certainty.”

Dante G. Mummolo for the plaintiff. Philip E. Murray, Jr., for the defendants.

Notes by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. DiGiovanni v. LatimerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Graci v. Massachusetts Gas & Electric Light Supply Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Booth v. SilvaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  2. Held v. BailMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  3. Joudrey v. Nashoba Community Hospital, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  4. Kilmartin v. Lowell General HospitalMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  5. LaFond v. CaseyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API