DiNozzi v. Lovejoy
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff suffered from back pain and her expert, Dr. Southmayd, an orthopedic surgeon, gave to the panel a written opinion which said in substance that the defendant, Dr. Lovejoy (an orthopedist), had failed to *974diagnose a raptured disc and had failed to undertake prompt surgical intervention. Had intervention been prompt, Dr. Southmayd added (he performed such surgery), the patient would have experienced a significantly better result. Dr. Southmayd gave his opinion upon “reasonable medical certainty.”
Dante G. Mummolo for the plaintiff. Philip E. Murray, Jr., for the defendants.
Notes by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- DiGiovanni v. LatimerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Graci v. Massachusetts Gas & Electric Light Supply Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
3Cited by10 opinions
- Booth v. SilvaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
- Held v. BailMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
- Joudrey v. Nashoba Community Hospital, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
- Kilmartin v. Lowell General HospitalMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
- LaFond v. CaseyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.