Legal Opinion
Napieralski v. Unity Church of Greater Portland
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided July 9, 2002PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
[¶ 1] Maria Napieralski appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Mills, C.J.) granting Unity *392Church of Greater Portland’s motion to dismiss. Napieralski argues that (1) we should, for the first time, recognize a cause of action for negligent supervision, and (2) to accommodate her negligent supervision claim, we should re-examine and change our holding in Swanson v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Portland, 1997 ME 63, 692 A.2d 441. Because on these facts we do not adopt a cause of action for negligent supervision, we do not reach Swanson, and we affirm the judgment of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gibson v. BrewerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Dairy Road Partners v. Island Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- Swanson v. Roman Catholic Bishop of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- Hutchison Ex Rel. Hutchison v. LuddySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- In Re Wage Payment LitigationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Fortin v. Roman Catholic Bishop of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- Mahar v. StoneWood TransportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- Moody v. State Liquor & Lottery CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
- Gomes v. University of Maine SystemDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004
- Flaherty v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.