Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Walman
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 9, 1977No. [Misc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 17, September Term, 1975.]Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
280 Md. 453 (1977)
374 A.2d 354
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND
v.
JOSEPH WALMAN
[Misc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 17, September Term, 1975.]
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Decided June 9, 1977.
The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and SINGLEY, SMITH, DIGGES, LEVINE, ELDRIDGE and ORTH, JJ.
William H. Zinman for respondent.
L. Hollingsworth Pittman, Bar Counsel, for petitioner.
2Opinion of the Court · LevineLevine, J.
MURPHY, C.J., and SMITH and DIGGES, JJ., dissent. MURPHY, C.J., filed a dissenting opinion in which SMITH and DIGGES, JJ., concur at page 466 infra. SMITH, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which MURPHY, C.J., and…
Also in this document: Dissent · Murphy; Dissent · Smith.
3Cases cited59 opinions
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Matter of RoussNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Ross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. AgnewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.