Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Bielenberg's Estate

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1930No. 6,498PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Citing to the point of the legal insufficiency of the evidence offered by contestants to prima facie overcome the presumption that Bielenberg was mentally competent to make a will: In reMcQuirk's Estate, 50 Cal.App. 352, 195 P. 279; In reSexton's Estate, 199 Cal. 759, 251 P. 778; In re Perkins'Estate, 195 Cal. 699, 235 P. 45; Wisner v. Chandler,95 Kan. 36, 147 P. 849; Graham v. Deuterman, 244 Ill. 124,91 N.E. 61; In re Phillips' Estate, 202 Cal. 490, 261 P. 709;In re Luckenbach's Estate, 205 Cal. 292, 270 P. 961; Clark v. Clark, 125 Or. 333, 267 P. 534; Hodges v. North,134 Okla. 22, 272 P.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Estate of PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Estate of SextonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Estate of ShayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Smith v. SpauldingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Murphy v. NettMontana Supreme Court · 1911

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re Baxter's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Matter of Estate of HolmMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  3. In Re Cummings' EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Hanson v. WilliamsMontana Supreme Court · 1965
  5. In Re Bright's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1931

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API