Legal Opinion

DeLuca v. DeLuca

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 25, 1995No. 13253PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s modification of custody. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly found that there had been a material change in circumstances since the custody order was entered at the time of dissolution and, therefore, the trial court improperly granted the defendant’s motion for modification. We find the record inadequate to review the plaintiff’s claim and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The marriage between the parties was dissolved by judicial decree on December 10, 1990. At the time of dissolution, the trial court incorporated the terms…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matza v. MatzaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. Holmes v. HolmesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  3. Water Street Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Innopak Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. State v. MarquisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. DiNapoli v. CookeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  2. Fitzgerald v. FitzgeraldConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  3. Cruz v. Visual Perceptions, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  4. Viets v. VietsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API