Legal Opinion

Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. Prince

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 19, 1925No. 8 Div. 741PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The suit is in damages for injuries to plaintiff’s person and to his automobile, resulting from a collision of the automobile with a locomotive of defendant at a .■grade crossing in the town of Stevenson.

The counts for simple negligence were withdrawn and the case went to the jury on a •count for wanton injury. This count sets out the quo modo of the accident. In sub■stance it charges that defendant, by its servants, did wantonly and recklessly, without warning, propel its train over a public roadway or crossing, within the corporate limits •of the town, where people were wont to cross ■with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Ga. Pacific Railway Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. Memphis & Charleston Railroad v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  4. Kennedy's Heirs v. Kennedy's HeirsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kurn v. CountsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  2. Myers v. EvansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  3. Lindekugel v. Spokane, P. & S. Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Bradshaw v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Chesapeake & O. Ry. v. BostonIndiana Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API