Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. Prince
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
The suit is in damages for injuries to plaintiff’s person and to his automobile, resulting from a collision of the automobile with a locomotive of defendant at a .■grade crossing in the town of Stevenson.
The counts for simple negligence were withdrawn and the case went to the jury on a •count for wanton injury. This count sets out the quo modo of the accident. In sub■stance it charges that defendant, by its servants, did wantonly and recklessly, without warning, propel its train over a public roadway or crossing, within the corporate limits •of the town, where people were wont to cross ■with…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Ga. Pacific Railway Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Memphis & Charleston Railroad v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- Kennedy's Heirs v. Kennedy's HeirsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kurn v. CountsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
- Myers v. EvansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
- Lindekugel v. Spokane, P. & S. Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1935
- Bradshaw v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Chesapeake & O. Ry. v. BostonIndiana Supreme Court · 1948