Legal Opinion
Kelly v. Lopeman
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided July 27, 1987No. C-3-85-930PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING IN PART AND SUSTAINING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS (DOCS. # 5 AND 6); THE DECISION OF THIS COURT SUSTAINING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS ON THE BASIS OF YOUNGER ABSTENTION IS AN OPINION ONLY; THE CLERK OF COURTS IS SPECIFICALLY DIRECTED NOT TO ENTER JUDGMENT; WITHIN 14 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THIS DECISION, THE PLAINTIFF MAY FILE A MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; IF NO MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS RECEIVED WITHIN THE 14-DAY PERIOD, THE COURT WILL DIRECT THE CLERK TO ENTER JUDGMENT
RICE, District Judge.
This action, which has previously been certified by this…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hinrichs v. GoodrichDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1990
- Detroit Memorial Park Ass'n v. City of Detroit Board of Zoning AppealsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
- Dock Farish v. Department of Talent and Economic DevelopmentMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
- PDX NORTH, INC. v. HAROLD J. WIRTHSDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- Sterling v. FeekDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.