Legal Opinion

Brown v. Giger

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1988No. 54121-3Published

1Opinion of the Court

111 Wn.2d 76 (1988)

757 P.2d 523

DANA BROWN, ET AL, Petitioners,

v.

SHARON M. GIGER, Respondent.

No. 54121-3.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

July 14, 1988.

Gary W. East, for petitioners.

Johnson & Rutz, by David V. Johnson, for respondent.

DURHAM, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action to recover moneys owed them by defendant under the terms of a promissory note. The trial court entered summary judgment for plaintiffs, but the Court of Appeals reversed, holding that defendant's debt must be offset by usury penalties. We reverse the Court of Appeals and reinstate the judgment of the trial court.

I

The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Griffith v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Teagle v. Fischer & Porter Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Skagit State Bank v. RasmussenWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Sparkman & McLean Co. v. Govan Investment TrustWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  5. National Bank of Commerce v. ThomsenWashington Supreme Court · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API