Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Speakman

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1937No. Civil No. 3854PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

This is an appeal by C. W. Peterson, George Frye and John A. Foote, as members of the board of supervisors of Maricopa county, hereinafter called respondents, from a judgment of the superior court of that county that a peremptory writ of mandamus be granted commanding them to issue three warrants of the county of Maricopa to Howard C. Speakman, hereinafter called petitioner.

The facts of the case are in nowise in dispute, and may be stated as follows: Petitioner was duly elected as judge of the superior court .of Maricopa county, at the general election in November, 1934, for a term of four…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Railroad v. CriderTennessee Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Malone v. MurphySupreme Court of Kansas · 1864
  4. Pratt v. BreckinridgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  5. White v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ong Hing v. ThurstonArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Rogone v. CorreiaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. County Court Judges Ass'n v. SidiWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. Coconino County v. LewisArizona Supreme Court · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API