Russell v. Fulton National Bank
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Jordan, Chief Justice.
In proceedings for the probate of a will, the trial court directed a verdict for the propounder on the issues of mistake of fact and undue influence and the jury returned a verdict for the propounder on the issue of lack of testamentary capacity. The caveatrix appeals after denial of her motion for new trial. We affirm.
The caveatrix, Carol Star Russell, is the daughter and only child of the testator, Dr. David Russell, Jr., by his second wife, Mrs. Glynette Russell, from whom the testator was divorced before his death. Caveatrix was disinherited by the will whereas…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Credille v. CredilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Irvin v. AskewSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- DeLoach v. SikesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Mitchell v. HillsmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Hammett v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sims v. SimsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
- McGee v. IngramSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Boney v. BoneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
- Boney v. BoneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1995