Legal Opinion

Sims v. Sims

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 30, 1995No. S94A1923PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fletcher, Justice.

The trial court denied a petition to probate the last will and codicil of Curtis Richard Sims after a jury found that they were the product of undue influence. Because there was insufficient evidence of undue influence at the time Sims executed the will and codicil, we reverse.

Sims drafted a will in 1984 dividing the residue of his estate to his four surviving children (Edward, Brenda, Anita, and Wayne) and the children of a deceased fifth child (Marshall). He revised the will in 1987 and deleted the provision giving Marshall’s children a per stirpes share of the estate.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pendley v. PendleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. Bohler v. HicksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Brumbelow v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  4. Boland v. AycockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  5. Cornelius v. CrosbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Georgia Power Co. v. IrvinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  2. Ogletree v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  3. Holland v. HollandSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  4. Quarterman v. QuartermanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  5. Mark Six Realty Associates, Inc. v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API