Legal Opinion

McGee v. Ingram

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 3, 1994No. S94A0988, S94X0990PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Justice.

Appellee-Executor filed the will of Mrs. Naomi Ingram for probate, but appellant-Caveators challenged the validity of the will on the grounds of Executor’s exercise of undue influence over Mrs. Ingram and Mrs. Ingram’s own lack of testamentary capacity. The probate court admitted the will to probate and, on Caveators’ appeal to the superior court, Executor moved for summary judgment. The superior court granted partial summary judgment as to the issue of Executor’s exercise of undue influence, but denied partial summary judgment as to the issue of Mrs. Ingram’s lack of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hayes v. MurraySupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  2. Kievman v. KievmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  3. Dean v. MorsmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  4. Mitchell v. HillsmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  5. Russell v. Fulton National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McConnell v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  2. Harper v. HarperSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  3. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  4. Ashford v. Van HorneSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  5. Bishop v. KennySupreme Court of Georgia · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API