Legal Opinion
Bias v. Cupp
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 24, 1969PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.
Petitioner appeals from an order sustaining a demurrer to his amended petition for post-conviction relief. The petition alleges nine causes of action. No reason is stated or apparent as to why the first eight of them were not raised in the unsuccessful direct appeal which defendant previously took to the Oregon Supreme Court. State v. Bias, 248 Or 24, 432 P2d 312 (1967).
ORS 138.550(2) provides in part:
“When the petitioner sought and obtained direct appellate review of his conviction and sentence, no ground for relief may be asserted * * * unless such ground was not asserted and could not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Cain v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. BiasOregon Supreme Court · 1967
3Cited by4 opinions
- Teague v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Cole v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- Nall v. WardenNevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Teague v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002