Legal Opinion
Masarjian v. Mark Lighting Fixtures Co., Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided October 11, 1984No. Civ. B-81-438 (PCD)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DORSEY, District Judge.
In this action, plaintiffs seek commissions allegedly due under a sales representative contract. Defendant has moved for summary judgment, Rule 56(b), Fed.R. Civ.P.
Background
The uncontroverted facts follow. On or about January 10, 1978, plaintiffs, Albert Masarjian and Fred Merrill, doing business as Meridian Enterprises (Meridian), entered into a sales representative agreement with defendant, Mark Lighting Fixtures Co., Inc. (Mark). Meridian was to solicit orders for commercial lighting fixtures manufactured by defendant. The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Corenswet, Inc. v. Amana Refrigeration, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Collins v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Harrison Western Corporation, a Florida Corporation v. Gulf Oil Company, a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Bushwick-Decatur Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Willis v. Champlain Cable Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1988
- Tifco, Inc. v. U.S. Repeating Arms Co. (In Re U.S. Repeating Arms Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1986
- Middletown Plaza Associates v. Dora Dale of Middletown, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1985