Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Denver National Bank

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1896PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

This action was instituted by The Denver National Bank, as plaintiff, against John P. Lower and Miers Fisher, upon the following promissory note:

“ Denver Colorado, Feby 5th, 1890.
“ Ninety days after date, for value received, we or either of us promise to pay to the order of The Denver National Bank ten thousand dollars at The Denver National Bank of *374Denver, with interest at the rate of eight per cent per annum from date until paid.
“$10,000.00/100 (Signed) John P. Lower
“ Miers Fjsher.”

Judgment by default was entered against Lower. The defendant Fisher filed an answer admitting the execution of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cary v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Hooker v. HubbardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  3. McLemore v. NuckollsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1861
  4. Huff v. ColeIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Brengle v. BusheyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hatten R. Co. v. Baylies Et Ux.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Pust v. Union Supply Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Dies v. Wilson County BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Bowling v. ChambersColorado Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. Wales v. MowerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API