Plumbers Local 200 Pension Fund v. Washington Post Company
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint [Docket No. 37; Filed May 11, 2012] (“Motion to Dismiss”). Plaintiff filed an Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss on June 25, 2012 [Docket No. 39], and Defendants filed a Reply on August 9, 2012 [Docket No. 41], Having considered the parties’ arguments, case pleadings, and relevant case law, the court finds that oral argument is unnecessary. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth below,
IT…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brattain v. AlcitepeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013