Legal Opinion

United States v. John Doe

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 27, 2013No. xx-xxxxPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeith, J.

COLE, J. (pp. 528-29), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and in the judgment. ROGERS, J. (pp. 529-30), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.

AMENDED OPINION

DAMON J. KEITH, Circuit Judge.

In 2010, the Fair Sentencing Act (“FSA”) was passed “to restore fairness to Federal cocaine sentencing.” Pub.L. Ill— 220, 124 Stat. 2372 (2010) (to be codified as amended in scattered sections of Title 21). The passage of the FSA was a monumental and commendable first step toward eliminating racial disparities in cocaine sentencing. Nevertheless, much work remains before fairness and integrity…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Dorsey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Miller v. FrenchSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Bryon TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. Bryon TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. Zachary MayesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. Zachary MayesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API