Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Zachary Mayes

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 6, 2014No. 13-5298Unpublished

1Concurrence

JANE B. STRANCH,

concurring.

I concur in the judgment but write separately to note that in my view, the government waives a statutory minimum by filing a substantial assistance motion. See also United States v. Taylor, 749 F.3d 541, 549 (6th Cir.2014) (Donald, J., dissenting); United States v. Doe, 731 F.3d 518, 528 (6th Cir.2013) (Cole, J., concurring in part and concurring in the judgment). If not for our case law to the contrary, see Taylor, 749 F.3d at 545, I would hold that Mayes was sentenced pursuant to a guidelines sentence that the sentencing court calculated to be 120 months and that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Bryon TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API