People v. Cotton
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment which resulted from his conviction on each of two counts of the crime of robbery. He also appeals from the order by which his motion for a new trial was denied.
No point is made by appellant to the effect that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict returned by the jury. However, in that connection it is contended by appellant that considering particularly the evidence introduced as to one count of the information, the alleged errors to which attention is directed were relatively increased in importance and thus became so prejudicial to the case…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. DoyellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- People v. FerdinandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- People v. . Jung HingNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- People v. WattsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Barkly v. CopelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- People v. SlobodionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- People v. LavenderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- People v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- State v. BrownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. AikersUtah Supreme Court · 1935
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.