United States v. Meyer
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7978 (T. D. 36766). [Oral argument, Eeb. 9,1917, by Mr. Hanson and Mr. Brown.]
1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge
The merchandise here is known as “Melba sauce.” As to what-in fact it is, the record is not conclusive. The board held, in view of the testimony, that it was like the commodity before it in Meyer & Lange v. United States, G. A. 7825 (T. D. 35950), in which case' the board stated in its opinion that the testimony was of very little-assistance in determining the classification, but upon the sample it said, “we judge it is the pulp of the raspberry, together with its-juice and probably added sugar. The seeds of the berry seem to-*28have been extracted. The substance flows readily and is of about…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bogle v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Knauth v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- In re JohnsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1893
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lehn & Fink Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- United States v. PealtzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Neuman & Schwiers Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
- Del Gaizo Distributing Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
- Yuen & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919