Legal Opinion

Ronald F. v. State Department of Developmental Services

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 1, 2017No. B267819PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHAVEZ, J.

—Appellant Ronald F appeals the denial of his petition for writ of administrative mandamus seeking to overturn the denial of his claim for services under the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 4500 et seq.) (Lanterman Act). The trial court denied the petition on the ground that appellant’s claim was barred by the doctrine of res judicata because his ineligibility for services had been previously adjudicated in two prior proceedings. Appellant contends res judicata does not apply because the court’s decision in Samantha C. v. State Dept.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lucido v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Mycogen Corp. v. Monsanto Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Boeken v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC.California Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Hassan v. Mercy American River HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. StrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 2022
  2. People v. Lewis CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. Tri-Counties Association etc. v. Ventura County Public GuardianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Vena v. Moore, Schulman & Moore, APCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API