Legal Opinion
Vena v. Moore, Schulman & Moore, APC
District Court, S.D. California
Decided August 31, 2022No. 3:22-cv-00437Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 NICHOLAS A VENA, Case No.: 3:22-cv-0437-W-BLM 14 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ 15 v. MOTION TO DISMISS AND STRIKE [DOC.7] 16 MOORE, SCHULMAN & MOORE, APC, et al. 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 Defendants Moore, Schulman & Moore, APC and Julie Westerman move to 21 dismiss the federal cause of action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 22 move to strike the state-based causes of action under California’s Anti-SLAPP Statute, 23 Code Civ. Pro., § 425.16. Plaintiff Nicholas A. Vena opposes. 24…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.