Legal Opinion
John S. Pleasant v. Larry Lovell, Larry Hyatt, Vernon Pixley, Kenneth Batson and Tim Fortune
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 6, 1989No. 87-1384Published
1Opinion of the Court
876 F.2d 787
63 A.F.T.R.2d 89-1379, 89-2 USTC P 9427
John S. PLEASANT, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Larry LOVELL, Larry Hyatt, Vernon Pixley, Kenneth Batson and
Tim Fortune, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 87-1384.
United States Court of Appeals,
Tenth Circuit.
May 16, 1989.
As Amended June 6, 1989.
William A. Cohan (Carl E. Stahl, with him on the brief), Cohan & Stahl, P.C., Denver, Colo. (John S. Pleasant, pro se, with him on the brief), for plaintiffs-appellants.
Elaine F. Ferris, Atty., Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington D.C. (Roger M. Olsen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Michael L. Paup, and Jonathan S.…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.