Legal Opinion

Saxe v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 7, 1997No. 95-CA-0329-MRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ABRAMSON, Judge.

The primary issue in this appeal is whether the trial judge erred in excluding from an award of damages in a motor vehicle accident case items which were paid or payable under the added reparations coverage in the insurance policy purchased by Appellants Curtis and Virginia Saxe. Citing as dispositive the holding in United Services Automobile Association v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Ky.App., 784 S.W.2d 786 (1990), the trial judge concluded that added reparation benefits are to be treated in the same manner as basic reparation benefits and thus all…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Coots v. Allstate Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Wemyss v. ColemanKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Allstate Insurance Co. v. DickeKentucky Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Hamilton v. Allstate Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. RuschellKentucky Supreme Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co v. HatfieldKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Dupin v. AdkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2000
  3. Cole v. FaginCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2013
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co v. HatfieldKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Nickerson v. American States InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API