Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Pannia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 14, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order of Onondaga County Court and order of Syracuse Municipal Court reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs. Memorandum: The affidavits submitted on the motion for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice establish the second cause of action alleged in plaintiff’s complaint for an account stated sufficiently to entitle the plaintiff to judgment. (See Rodkinson v. Haecker, 248 N. Y. 480, 485.) The opposing affidavit made by defendants’ attorney is not based upon personal knowledge, but on hearsay and must therefore be disregarded.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rodkinson v. HaeckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Favole v. GalloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  3. City Savings Bank of Brooklyn v. TorroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  4. Buffalo General Hospital v. SuppaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Two Clinton Square Corp. v. Gorin Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API