Legal Opinion
Buffalo General Hospital v. Suppa
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 28, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Memorandum: The plaintiff having set forth facts by affidavits which substantiate the allegations of its complaint and which, if proved, would entitle the plaintiff to judgment, and the defendant having failed to show by affidavit or otherwise that it has a meritorious defense, the motion of plaintiff for summary judgment should have been granted. (General Investment Co. v. Interborough R. T. Co., 235 N. Y. 133; O’Meara Co. v. National Park Bank, 239 id. 386, 395.) The two cases…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- General Investment Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Standard Oil Co. v. BoyleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Poland Export Corp. v. MarcusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Brawer v. Mendelson Bros. Factors, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corp. v. Lazard-Godchaux Co. of America, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ecker v. MuzyshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Buffalo Savings Bank v. O'GormanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Cohen v. PanniaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959