Legal Opinion

Clayton v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1956No. 33451PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

The issue here presented is the sufficiency of the evidence to support a jury’s finding that the extent of the claimant’s “permanent partial disability resulting from aggravation of the condition caused by his September 24, 1937, injury between May 15, 1946, and October 4, 1951,” was 22.75%. From the judgment entered on that finding of the jury, the department of labor and industries appeals. The claimant, respondent in this court, has filed no brief and made no argument.

There is no merit in the department’s contention that the questions asked did not, as required by the Laws of 1951, chapter…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Franks v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Berndt v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Kirkpatrick v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Moses v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Cyr v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Page v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Dowell v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Hulsizer v. Johnson-Brennan Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  4. Orr v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Abbott v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API