Grossman Bros. v. Goldman
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Linn, J.,
This case was tried in the municipal court by a judge without a jury and defendant now contends that he was deprived of his right to a jury trial without his consent. The suit was in assumpsit to recover commissions alleged to have been earned by a real estate broker, and involved a dispute of fact, but while triable by jury at common law, the parties could waive that right and agree to a trial by a judge without-a jury. The only point now is whether they agreed.
Defendant contends that he did not agree, and in support of his contention shows that he filed an affidavit of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kaplan v. BaronSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Pusey's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
3Cited by3 opinions
- Neely v. J. A. Young & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Cohen v. SykesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Rennekamp Supply Co. v. ValicentiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955