Legal Opinion
Neely v. J. A. Young & Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 13, 1962No. Appeal, No. 126PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Montgomery, J.,
Seeking to recover fees in the sum of $1,707.80 for legal services, plaintiffs-appellees filed in the County Court of Allegheny County a complaint in assumpsit with a praecipe for the appointment of arbitrators pursuant to the compulsory provisions of the Arbitration Act of June 16, 1836, P.L. 715, §8, 5 P.S. 21, and the County Court Arbitration Rules which provide (inter alia) that all civil cases wherein the amount in controversy is $2,000 or less (with certain exceptions not applicable herein) “. . . automatically shall be submitted to ... a Board of Arbitrators, .…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Smith CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Anderson v. Carnegie Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Wright v. BarberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Cole v. Philadelphia CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Gordon, SEC. of Bk. v. BiesingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ottavio v. Fibreboard Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Lanigan v. LEWISSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Rodney v. WiseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Keisling v. Carlynton School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Independent Development Corp. v. Shiloh American Legion, Post 791, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, York County1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.