Legal Opinion

Downes v. Maryland & Delaware Railroad

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 18, 1872PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Queen Anne’s County. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. The verdict and judgment were for the plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtBartol, C. J.

This suit was instituted by the appellee, to recover the amount of the alleged subscription by the appellant’s testator, to the capital stock of the appellee. The questions presented by this appeal arise upon two bills of exceptions taken by the defendant below, as follows: The Court

below after objection by the defendant, allowed Robert Jarrell, a stockholder in the company, to testify generally for the plaintiffs on their call, and the question of his competency forms the subject of the second bill of exceptions.

The first bill of exceptions presents substantially the same legal question. It…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City Bank v. BatemanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1826

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Whitney, Exec. v. HalibutCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  2. Trupp v. WolffCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  3. Horner v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
  4. South Baltimore Co. v. MuhlbachCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
  5. Trahern ex rel. Trahern v. ColburnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API