Legal Opinion

Monge v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 9, 1986No. B015480PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS, P. J.

By petition for mandate, plaintiffs seek review of an order striking from their complaint all allegations concerning punitive damages. Leave to amend was not granted.

The questions presented are (1) whether punitive damages may be recovered in a civil action for conduct constituting employment discrimination in the form of sexual harassment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and constructive termination of employment, and (2) whether this complaint states sufficient facts for punitive damage liability.

The first amended complaint alleges that while plaintiff…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Alcorn v. Anbro Engineering, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. G. D. Searle & Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Hentzel v. Singer Co.California Court of Appeal · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Stirlen v. Supercuts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Trujillo v. North County Transit Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Hernandez v. Hillsides, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Peralta Community College District v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API