Legal Opinion
State v. Small
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided January 16, 2004No. 2002-592PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNadeau, J.
The defendant, Daniel Small, appeals his convictions, following a jury trial in Superior Court {Barry, J.), on six felony counts of stalking. See RSA 633:3-a (Supp. 2002) (amended 2002); RSA 173-B:9 (2002) (amended 2002). We affirm.
The six indictments against the defendant related to incidents allegedly occurring on or about October 17, 2001, and October 24, 2001. Three indictments, relating to October 17, 2001, alleged that the defendant, having been provided with a protective order issued pursuant to RSA 173-B:3, and having previously been convicted of violating a protective order,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. BruneauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- State v. FortierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- State v. GuaraldiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- State v. DemerittSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- State v. RamosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. RussellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Truesdell v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Miller v. BlackdenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- State v. SimoneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.