Legal Opinion
Pennsylvania v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 1, 2010No. Civil 1:09-CV-0821PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
SYLVIA H. RAMBO, District Judge.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Environmental Protection, (“PADEP”), brought this action for the recovery of response costs incurred in the cleanup of Strontium-90, (“Sr-90”), a radioactive and hazardous nuclear byproduct material, at or from the Quehanna Wild Area Nuclear Site in the Quehanna Wild Area of the Moshannon State Forest in Clearfield County, Pennsylvania, (“site”). Defendant Lockheed Martin Corporation’s, (“LMC”), predecessor, the Martin-Marietta Corporation, was the last known user of Sr-90 at the site. 1
PADEP’s cost…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Geneva College v. SebeliusDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Blettner Avenue, LLC v. Rental Uniform Service, Inc. and Cintas CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- Pennsylvania, Department of Environmental Protection v. Lockheed Martin Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Talarico Bros. Building Corp. v. Union Carbide CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2021
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.