Legal Opinion

Kahl v. Kallis

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided August 21, 2019No. 1:18-cv-01245Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION YORIE VON KAHL, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. 18-cv-1245-JES ) STEVE KALLIS, Warden ) ) Respondent. ) ORDER AND OPINION Now before the Court is Petitioner Yorie Von Kahl’s pro se Motion to Amend or Alter Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) (Doc. 17). After filing his pro se Rule 59(e) Motion, Petitioner retained counsel, who has filed a Memorandum in Support of Petitioner’s pro se Motion (Doc. 21). For the reasons set forth below, Petitioner Yorie Von Kahl’s Rule 59(e) Motion (Doc. 17) is…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API