State v. HALL
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Baker, Chief Justice.
There is but one issue in this case, the second issue having been abandoned upon oral argument. This issue, as stated by appellants, is: “Was the sentence of the Trial Judge of two years imprisonment excessive, unusual, unreasonable and oppressive and in violation of the Constitution of the State of South Carolina and of the United States?”
*547The “appellants-defendants were indicted and tried in the Court of General Sessions for Richland County at the June, 1953, term, on several counts involving spirituous liquor, ■ and were convicted on the sixth count' which charged that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. KimbroughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
- State v. BrandonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
- State v. ScatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
- State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
- State v. GoodallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. HollmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
- State v. ConallySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
- State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
- State v. CogdellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
- State v. HALLSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.