State v. Kimbrough
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
OxnEr, J.:
This opinion will be substituted for the opinion heretofore filed.
Appellant was convicted of burglary. His appeal raises two questions: (1) Did the trial Judge err in refusing a motion for a directed verdict of not guilty on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to sustain a conviction? (2) Is the sentence imposed manifestly excessive?
Appellant offered no testimony. The circumstances relied on by the State to support a conviction are substantially as follows:
Between three and four o’clock on the morning of December 3, 1946, someone broke into and entered a room on the fifth…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- McNamara v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- State v. GregorySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
- State v. EpesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. CooperWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
- Workman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
- Roberts v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.