Legal Opinion

State v. Kimbrough

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 12, 1948No. 16043PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OxnEr, J.:

This opinion will be substituted for the opinion heretofore filed.

Appellant was convicted of burglary. His appeal raises two questions: (1) Did the trial Judge err in refusing a motion for a directed verdict of not guilty on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to sustain a conviction? (2) Is the sentence imposed manifestly excessive?

Appellant offered no testimony. The circumstances relied on by the State to support a conviction are substantially as follows:

Between three and four o’clock on the morning of December 3, 1946, someone broke into and entered a room on the fifth…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. McNamara v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. State v. GregorySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  4. State v. EpesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
  5. State v. DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State v. CooperWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Workman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
  5. Roberts v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API