Legal Opinion

State v. HALL

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 10, 1954No. 16832Published

1Opinion of the Court

224 S.C. 546 (1954)

80 S.E.2d 239

STATE

v.

HALL ET AL.

16832

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

February 10, 1954.

J.A. Hutto, Esq., of Columbia, for Appellants.

T.P. Taylor, Esq., Solicitor, of Columbia, for Respondent.

February 10, 1954.

BAKER, Chief Justice.

There is but one issue in this case, the second issue having been abandoned upon oral argument. This issue, as stated by appellants, is: "Was the sentence of the Trial Judge of two years imprisonment excessive, unusual, unreasonable and oppressive and in violation of the Constitution of the State of South Carolina and of the United States?"

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. KimbroughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  2. State v. BrandonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  3. State v. ScatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  4. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  5. State v. GoodallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API