Legal Opinion

Bridge v. Credit One Fin., Corp.

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided February 23, 2018No. Case No. 2:14-cv-1512-LDG (NJK)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lloyd D. George, United States District Judge

In his Amended Complaint, William Bridge alleges that Credit One violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act when, without his prior express consent, it used an auto-dialer to place calls to his cellular telephone number from around January to March 2014.

On January 18, 2014, Bridge used his cell phone to contact Credit One regarding his mother's account. He alleges he did so without her knowledge or consent, that he talked with a Credit One representative, and that he advised that he was making the call in relation to his mother's account.…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Juan Martinez, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2021
  2. Hirsch v. USHealth Advisors, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2020
  3. In re Humana, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
  4. Latoria George and Johnnie Rushing, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. Steven E. Sanders, in his official capacity as East Baton Rouge Parish Ward 3 District 2 Justice of the PeaceDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2026
  5. Leeb v. Charter Communications, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API