Legal Opinion

Guse v. Gladden

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1966PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWAB, J. (Pro Tempore).

This is an appeal from a judgment denying post-conviction relief. In 1963 petitioner Guse was convicted of burglary and on May 13, 1964 we affirmed the conviction. State v. Guse, 237 Or 479, 392 P2d 257. In the course of the trial which resulted in his conviction, a confession which he had given to police officers after he was arrested was introduced into evidence. It is conceded that the officers who obtained the confession did not advise him of his right to counsel or right to remain silent.

The issue is whether the rule of Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 US 478, 84 S Ct…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. North v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State v. FairOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. EvansOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Clark v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Dorsciak v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API