Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Daniel v. Broad River Power Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided July 9, 1929No. 12698PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Carter.
We desire to state at the outset that the Court, in the preparation of its opinion in this case, has followed, in the main, the well-prepared argument of counsel for petitioners.
This proceeding, commenced July 19, 1927, is in the original jurisdiction of this Court for a writ of mandamus requiring and compelling the respondents to resume and continue the operation of the electric street railway system in the City of Columbia and other places near said city, the operation having been discontinued March 11, 1927. The alleged facts upon…
2Cases cited79 opinions
- Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minneapolis Civic & Commerce Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. North Carolina Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Blair v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Detroit v. Detroit Citizens' Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Drug, Inc. v. HuntSupreme Court of Delaware · 1933
- William C. Atwater & Co. v. Fall River Pocahontas Collieries Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Public Service CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1948
- Southern Ry. Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
- State Ex Rel. Condon v. HodgesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.