Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Condon v. Hodges
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided April 18, 2002No. 25451PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore
We accepted this matter in our original jurisdiction to determine whether the Attorney General has the authority to bring an action against the Governor, whether a separation of powers violation has occurred, and whether the Governor is required to return a balanced budget to the General Assembly.
*236FACTS
This action was commenced by the plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as the Attorney General). Thereafter, a request to intervene by certain Senators and Representatives of the General Assembly was granted. An amicus curiae brief on behalf of the Officers of the House Democratic Caucus was…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hodges v. RaineySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Colorado General Assembly v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Clarke v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Cowan v. WilkinsonKentucky Supreme Court · 1992
- Fordice v. BryanMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In re Cardizem CD Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- People Ex Rel. Salazar v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- California v. Infineon Technologies AGDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
- Jim Wayne in His Official Capacity as State Representative v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Office of the Governor Matthew Bevin in His Official Capacity as GovernorKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
- Hunter v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.