Legal Opinion
Huffman v. Fiola
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 6, 1994No. C 93-20555 JWPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER PARTIALLY DISMISSING CLAIMS AND FOR SERVICE
WARE, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Susan Huffman, has filed a pro se civil rights complaint against Defendants pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. She also seeks to proceed in fonna pauperis.
I. BACKGROUND
A. November 19, 1993 Order
In its November 19, 1993 Order, the Court found Plaintiff stated cognizable claims against Defendants Fióla, Dalton and Lizarraga for violation of her Fourth and Eighth Amendment rights. The Court 1) dismissed Plaintiffs deprivation of property claim, 2) dismissed her access to the law library claim and 3) dismissed the County…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Buckley v. GomezDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1997
- Ramírez Salcedo v. Estado Libre AsociadoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1996
- Mathie v. FriesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Crenshaw v. City of Defuniak SpringsDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1995
- Buckley v. GomezDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1997